Farmers Have Trust Issues With Big Data -- For The Same Reasons We All DoPrecision agriculture is changing the way people farm. But the familiar pitfalls of data collection threaten to hold the industry back.

ByMichael Gilbert

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

The Good Brigade | Getty Images

Every 10 minutes, the farmers we work with get vital signs from every corner of their fields and orchards. Temperature. Humidity. Barometric pressure. Insect populations. With astounding precision, a system of thousands of networked sensors reports back on conditions with a level of detail unimaginable even a decade ago.

But here's my greatest fear: All this data — the backbone of a burgeoning agtech industry that has the potential to reshape how we grow food — also has the potential to make farmers' lives harder. And for all of our technological sophistication, we could end up doing little more than adding noise to their busy lives, rather than helping them grow more, better, healthier crops.

We're sitting on the precipice of a huge moment for agriculture technology, as it's poised to become a$22 billion industryby 2025. Precision agriculture (using data and AI to optimize farming) has a big role to play in that. But to get there, we need to first understand the fundamental difference between signal and noise for the farmers on the ground using our tools.

In short, as agtech providers, how do we do a better job giving farmers "news they can use" … and filtering out the rest?

The challenge for growers

Data and analytics is now instrumental to nearly every industry. Yet a common theme persists.

Inone study, 91% of executives said their data hadn't reached a "transformational level" within their business. Most cited complexity and a lack of training as barriers.

Precision ag providers need to be the same thing — a simple stepping stone to a smart decision, not a mountain to climb

For farmers, these challenges are especially acute. They now have access to more data than ever about their crops. Using it, though, is another story. In fact, a2020 study显示,70%的农民说他们没有东北cessary training to use more data in their operations, and 75% said they didn't have time to deal with it.

把自己放在他们的鞋子。你有多个系统tems reporting back on several aspects of your operation. Oftentimes, these tools aren't compatible with each other, so each is delivering a different set of numbers on a different platform. Farmers are left to sift through this flood of information, when they really want actionable insights. Big data needs to be a trusted advisor, not a complicated adversary.

农民什么really want in their data

There's a line fromGoogle's philosophythat a lot of companies can learn from: "We may be the only people in the world who can say our goal is to have people leave our website as quickly as possible." Precision ag providers need to be the same thing — a simple stepping stone to a smart decision, not a mountain to climb. To me, this comes down to a few key considerations:

Data vs. insight

As a scientist working in this field, I know all about the immense amount of data required to make predictions on these complex farms. But what's far more valuable to a grower is the actionable insight. It's like the difference between a diagnosis (knowing what's wrong) and a prognosis (knowing what to do about it). Contemporary sensor technology can give farmers a row-by-row or even plant-by-plant breakdown of things like insect pressure or water absorption. But it's one thing to soak in all that information, and another entirely to know what to do about it.

Timeframe matters

In many cases, "actionable" depends on the timeframe. Farmers in the field need days, if not weeks, to marshal a response to changing conditions. That's why reporting on real-time conditions is less helpful than anticipating what lies ahead. And this is where AI and machine learning are indispensable. A huge pest for growers we work with is navel orangeworm. These moths can decimate an orchard fast. If growers were only being alerted as the attack was underway, they would be left defenseless. Instead, they need tools that can predict an infestation in advance and advise on (or better yet, automatically trigger) an appropriate response.

Zooming out before you zoom in

On any farm, you have different individuals relying on data — from people in the field trying to make quick decisions armed with just a smartphone, to managers poring over charts and tables on desktops. That's why agtech needs to take a cue from consumer technology and put user experience at the forefront. Successful products start with a simple dashboard where anyone can see mission-critical information like weather, pest pressure, water management and plant stress. A grower can dive as deep as they want into the platform for more information, but can take comfort in knowing they don't have to.

Independence is everything

A 2018studylooked at farmers' perspectives on Big Data, and found privacy and ownership were among their biggest concerns. Who is collecting the data gathered from my fields? Is it being sold to others? Is the advice I'm getting on everything from pest control to fertilizer unbiased and objective … or is there a hidden agenda? That's why agtech providers need to offer clarity on what data is being collected, why, and how it will ultimately be used. Farmers have a good nose for conflicts of interest, and nobody wants to see their information sold to third parties, or potentially used against them.

In the face of challenges ranging from shifting weather patterns to supply chain disruptions, precision agriculture represents a powerful way to help nature feed a growing population. The right data means the potential to do more with less: fewer inputs and lower costs for higher yields and greater ROI. But for this potential to truly be realized requires looking beyond data collection, machine learning and cutting-edge technology and seeing eye-to-eye with the one person who makes this all possible: the farmer.

Wavy Line
Michael Gilbert

Entrepreneur Leadership Network Contributor

Founder and Director of the Board at Semios

Michael Gilbert is the CEO of Semios, helping farmers use data to optimize every acre. He is a father, founder and scientist who is passionate about sustainability and having fun shaping the future.

Editor's Pick

Related Topics

Business News

Google Engineers Rake in Big Bucks with Base Salaries up to $718,000, According to a New Report

The data comes from an internal spreadsheet shared among Google employees, comprised of information from over 12,000 U.S. workers for 2022.

Business News

Say Hello to the 'Iced Pumpkin Cream Chai Tea Latte': Starbucks New Fall Menu Leaked Online

Instagram influencer exposes an alleged menu from the mega-coffee chain that has some customers delighted and depresso.

领导

Two Stanford Professors Explain How to Produce Hundreds of World-Changing Ideas In 1 Hour

Cramming everyone into a conference room to "spitball" is a disaster. But with some structure and a system, literally thousands of ideas are within reach.

Branding

Is Elon Musk Pushing His Luck? Why Twitter's Rebrand to 'X' Might Resemble These 6 Rebranding Fails

Successful rebrands require a deep understanding of consumer sentiment and a clear vision for the future.

Science & Technology

Why Digital Biology Has the Power to Change the Game Across Industries

Is digital biology the next big thing?

Growing a Business

We Will Inevitably Lose Skills to AI, But Do The Benefits Outweigh The Risks?

The discourse around AI has often been painted in a tone of gloom and doom, with critics suggesting that we are bound to lose essential skills to our AI counterparts, a phenomenon we can call the "ChatGPT effect." Yet the reality is that losing certain skills to AI, much like the advent of calculators and the internet, is not only inevitable but also beneficial to human progress.