How the Recent Changes in Insolvency Code will Benefit MSMEsRecommendations made by the committee to the Government of India regarding the changes in bankruptcy laws

ByManoj K Singh

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media.

Entrepreneur India

The Government of India after the introduction of I&B Code 2016 was receiving representation from stakeholders w.r.t hindrances they were facing under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 and rules made thereunder. A sense of insecurity was seen in many Corporate Debtors especially MSMEs after the introduction of the Code. More importantly after the recent amendment introduced in the Code which had restricted the promoters of the Corporate Debtor to be resolution applicant.

Committee set by the Government

A Committee was formed by Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India having representation from various institutes, industry chambers and experts in various disciplines. The members of the Committee keeping in mind the difficulties and challenges received from various stakeholders submitted its report recently.

Recommendations

Many key recommendations were made in the report including the recommendations w.r.t Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). The committee observed that MSMEs forms the foundation of the Indian economy, and are key drivers of employment, production, economic growth, entrepreneurship and financial inclusion. MSMEs hold in the Indian economy cannot be underestimated, as they are one of the best vehicles for job creation and economic growth.

The recommendations given by the Committee includes rationalization in the provisions of Section 29A w.r.t MSMEs. Section 29A which has been introduced recently in the I&B Code 2016 restricts promoters to be resolution applicant. On the contrary, in case of MSMEs mostly the promoters will be interested in acquiring them. Meaning thereby, if the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process is triggered in case of any MSME, the result due to restriction as to Resolution Applicant is liquidation. The Committee thereof had recommended that promoters of such MSMEs who are not declared willful defaulter be allowed to participate in the resolution process.

Suggestions

Further, the Committee has suggested that at the moment there is no requirement to increase the payment to Operational Creditor from the present case of Liquidation value. The Committee though had discussed in detail that in case Operational Creditors have not been paid properly and paid with liquidation value, they can interrupt the working of the Corporate Debtor but it was the suggestion of Committee that at present instead of increasing the share of operational creditor, an attempt be made that quality of the resolution plan be improved. The Committee while deciding on this issue have also referred to the decisions of various adjudicating authorities who while approving the Resolution plan have considered high value for Operational creditors i.e. more than the liquidation value given under the Code or even the timelines of 30 days. The Committee, however, keeping larger interest in mind suggested to not amend the provisions in this regard even for MSMEs.

委员会还建议部分240be introduced under the I&B Code, which empowers the Central Government to exempt or vary the application of provisions of the Code by way of a notification for a certain class or classes of companies including for MSMEs. Similarly, Section 240B, be inserted which will give the power to provide relief to MSMEs from the provisions of code which restricts the eligibility criteria of resolution applicants however this will not exempt the resolution applicants even in case of MSMEs which are declared as Willful Defaulter as per the guidelines of Reserve Bank of India.

Conclusion

In overall the Insolvency Law Committee considering the fact that MSMEs are the backbone of Indian Economy tried to safeguard their interest and if the recommendation gets implemented will definitely give a sense of relief to the promoters of MSMEs facing the threat of CIRP. Further, even the operational creditors of such MSMEs will not try to hamper the interest of the MSMEs as they are bound by Code to receive the liquidation value within the prescribed timelines of 30 days.

Wavy Line
Manoj K Singh

Founding Partner, Singh and Associates

Manoj K Singh is the Founding Partner of Singh and Associates.

Related Topics

Growing a Business

Are You Guilty of Poor Onboarding? The Consequences Are Worse Than You Think.

The onboarding process has a profound effect on your employee satisfaction, retention and productivity. Harness these actionable strategies to optimize your onboarding process, ensuring a smooth transition for new hires.

Devices

3 Things Businesses Should Remember When Handling Used Consumer Electronics

Most businesses rely on electronic equipment, but not enough know how to handle and dispose of it properly.

Growing a Business

How I Bootstrapped to $100 Million Without Venture Capital Funding

How I grew my business without any VC funding — and how you can, too.

Business News

'Life of a Girl Dad:' Mark Zuckerberg Rocks Face Gems and Beaded Bracelets at Taylor Swift Concert

The Facebook founder attended the economy-boosting "Eras" tour with his daughters.

Finance

A Founder-First VC Firm That Likes Bold Ideas

BEENEXT's funding prospects for the coming year are optimistic as it continues to identify promising founders and their ground-breaking startup ideas.

Business News

'Treat People the Way You Want to be Treated': Pilot Goes Viral For Rant Directed at 'Selfish' Passengers

The American Airlines pilot wasn't tolerating any unruly behavior.